[hand] [face]
The Original Deep Purple Web Pages
The Highway Star

Pulling out all the stops

Metal Hammer Germany, July 2024

German version of the Metal Hammer magazine has an interview with Ian Gillan and Simon McBride in their July 2024 issue, done on the occasion of the new album =1. Quote of the day:

Like its four predecessors, created under the sound direction and with the co-compositional skills of Bob Ezrin, the band around singer Ian Gillan pulls out all the stops and delivers ā€” certainly also thanks to new
guitarist Simon McBride ā€” in a class of its own on all levels.

Thanks to Tobias Janaschke for the info.



35 Comments to “Pulling out all the stops”:

  1. 1
    Gregster says:

    Yo,

    Sound like a very good & honest review, by someone with their ears open, & open mind to listen to other current music to compare with. Well done all past albums with Mr.Ezrin it would seem !

    Let the good-times-roll !

    Peace !

  2. 2
    Simon says:

    I still think Bob told him to play like Steve… šŸ™‚

  3. 3
    Thorsun says:

    #2
    Simon, show me a guitarist with personality and attitude who accepts being told by anyone what to play… Really, you think Simon would? I say ‘no’. Our Simon is too clever for that – he’s slowly working on his on stamp to form in Deep Purple. He’s a clever listener – takes bits and pieces from both Steve and Ritchie and mixes it in with us own likings on how to play. And I like it a lot. I’m confident he surely will not sound “like Steve” on new record. Dots of resemblance are only dots, and tasteful ones are they as for what I hear, may I add. He will prove his own claw on the soundstage, I am sure.

  4. 4
    Tomek K says:

    Bob was not seen to like all elements of Steve style. I thinks he gave Simon more freedomā€¦

  5. 5
    QuelloCheHaRagione says:

    Even wanted.. Simon can’t sound like Steve. This things makes no Sense.
    They swap to this guy insted of slowing a bit.
    Steve take the band After Ritchie and everybody was like “no Ritchie no purple”.. he Is a Guitar god so he made it possible. He fit in a band for almost 30 years, now this goofy guy came from nowhere sit on his chair and people are like “he play like Steve and like Ritchie”..”he Is good”..come on..for shure he play Better than me..buy he can’t replace 2 guitar gods..
    What does It mean to hire a guy to play 2-3 years insted of keeping Steve and slow down?! Instead of respecting the guy that took they’re band and give It future. They now this thing’s going to end someday.
    In my opinion they step on a shit this time.
    Maybe i dont have a open mind.. but I mind what I listen

  6. 6
    Harold Sorensen says:

    #4
    I agree Ezrin restricted Morse ,even when he was in Kansas, when Ezrin arrived you can immediately perceive the restrictions on his playing.

  7. 7
    Thorsun says:

    #5

    Quello, you do forget one important thing. Gillan, Glover, Paice and Airey might not be here in few years, they are 75-80. As Freddie once sang, “time waits for nobody”. Also, to widen your perspective – find yourself an interview of Rick Beato with Steve. He might have been for 28 years with the band but even after he left – he expressed still and on not feeling totally comfortable in that role. Plus he was ignored in his stance to require a slow down. All this, and the circumstances with Janine, might have made him want to go his way. I love him as a human, most lovable and humble person and a genius musician. I adore many of his solo things and many he has come up with in DP. Still my purple sense of hearing had some “beef” with some of his preferred elements of playing style. They do belong on Morse records, but not necessarily blend with DP sound. Hence – I prefer Simon to get the fold to carry on and I like what he does. With no disrespect to all Steve’s achievements.

    Was it all played in the bad manner by the members of DP? Who are we to tell? One could say the same was done by Chris Squire and Steve Howe in Yes circa 2010 when they didn’t wait for Jon Anderson to recover for anniversary tour. Before long Mr Squire was not with us anymore… They all sense the clock ticking and maybe it informs their decisions. Who are we to condemn that?

  8. 8
    Tommy H. says:

    @ #3, Thorsun:

    It really depends if you want to have a producer because that guy will interfere with your playing to a certain degree. If you don’t want one you can do whatever you like. It doesn’t necessarily mean that people want to hear it.

  9. 9
    Uwe Hornung says:

    Simon says in one of his many Purple-related interviews in the German mags that if you want to pin him down to two influences then these are Gary Moore and Steve Lukather – as you would expect from someone who learned guitar as a child in the 80ies. If you want to make it three, then add Joe Satriani, he says. Neither Ritchie nor Tommy nor Steve were guitarists he patterned himself after, but he did grow up in a household where his dad listened to the Brit Trinity of Heavy Rock frequently, i.e. Zep, Purple & Sabbath, so that left a mark too. And playing with Sweet Savage as a very young adult gave him a heavy metal influence though he followed that immediately by playing for six years for ex-Commitments Andrew Strong, which gave him a Rhythm & Blues foundation.

    Simon is from a different generation (even Steve Morse will be turning 70 this year!) and has different influences to all his DP-predecessors, isnā€™t it rather a moot point to now determine whether heā€™s the new BlackMor(s)e? Even Blackmore couldnā€™t really be the Blackmore of the 70ies today anymore, heā€™s unfortunately proven that.

    Also in one of those lengthy German interviews, Gillan observed that one big difference between Steve and Simon is that Steve in essence approached any song as an instrumental and that he (Gillan) wasnā€™t even sure whether Steve listened to his vocal melodies. He hastens to add that Steve wasnā€™t DPā€™s guitarist for almost 30 years for nothing and that he often created magic with his approach of weaving intricate musical arrangements, but that Simon has a more singer-focused way of songwriting (Uwe: perhaps from all these years with Andrew Strong?) and that his riffing and rhythm guitar is more propulsive.

    Iā€™m just quoting, donā€™t shoot the messenger!

    Oh, and unrelated: Little Ian calls Come Taste The Band a very important album for the development of Purple – even though the Bolin era was so short – because it showed them how much they could deviate from the tried and trusted formula with DC and Glenn bringing in Blues & Funk while Tommy contributed Soul influences. Plus that Tommy was great at recording in the studio, but incredibly fickle and easy to be distracted live which made him unreliable on stage.

  10. 10
    Thorsun says:

    #5 and one more thing Quelle

    You cite people who said in 1994 “No Ritchie – no Purple”. And now YOU go “No Steve – no Purple”. Where’s the consequence in that? What’s the logic?

    Either you accept that it’s the collective sound that makes the name and trademark or… You have the war of lineups. IG himself refuses to acknowledge MkIII to V and on and eat cetera… You don’t like the sound now – you have 3 decades of recordings to cherish.

  11. 11
    Fla76 says:

    #5 :
    Simon is not a phenomenon like Steve, that’s for sure….but it’s equally true that in the last few records Steve had lost freshness, while Simon has reinvigorated the sound and made the songs more immediate and digestible, this is a great point in his favor even if he is a “Mr. nobody”

  12. 12
    Martin says:

    @ Uwe #9:
    I read the same interview and was quite a bit surprised about the things big Ian had to say. Wasn’t he saying for years, if not decades, that Purple is an instrumental band first?

    I get all the PR bla they have to go through with the new album ahead, because “new is new” and so there have to be exciting new things to praise. But to assume Steve wasn’t listening… don’t know. Doesn’t sound fair, does it?
    My point is: there’s no need to belittle the past to be excited for future…

    @Fla76 #11:
    Yeah, I get your point. The last records seemed a bit more tame on the guitar side. I always wondered if it had something to do with Ezrin producing…?
    While within the same period Steve contributed to stellar Flying Colors records…
    Guess we’ll never know.

  13. 13
    Gregster says:

    LOL !

    There are countless amazing musicians out there, that can do amazing musical expressions that identify themselves, & plenty of these people are guitarists.

    The hardest part in playing in a band, is getting-along with everyone, & typically with all the love & effort poured-in, 18-months, maybe 2-years is about the amount of time before everything turnes-to-shyte, & people move-on, or a band dissolves…

    DP have been there & done that, & all this they’ve gone through before, so give them some credit & a dash of wisdom in selecting Simon, & deciding to continue on as a band.

    Steve made an important decision, & will be honoured for his decisions & contributions for ever. Quite a difficult set-of-circumstances to have to deal with, but he did make the right choice obviously…And so did the band…Both are happy & still playing music.

    Let’s look forward to the next few albums at least. The band may have another 10-years left in it, who knows ?…But Simon is the right-guy, have no doubt here. He’s one of countless capable guitarists, but what he has seems to be the chemistry needed to get along with everyone, & not be a “useless bitch” like some other members were before him.

    We have everything to look forward to. Relax, & enjoy the music !

    Peace !

  14. 14
    Uwe Hornung says:

    Whatā€™s a phenomenon? Some people would say a 12-year old kid that plays like this is:

    https://youtu.be/vwlWgYsyp1k?si=UTqVNkzL6onrN06X

    I doubt Ritchie and Tommy played like this at age 12, Joe S and Steve might, but likely not any better.

    Is Simon an early stylist and innovator like Ritchie? Nope, those days are gone and 50 years of rock since Ritchie left everyone gaping has seen guitar playing develop technically, but perhaps become less idiosyncratic as individual players go. Is Simon as technically impeccable as Steve was in his heyday before his arm started acting up? No, but then who was/is?

    I think the kid from Belfast is objectively pretty darn good. Itā€™s hard to imagine in this day and age someone of his generation who plays considerably better and would be a better fit for Purple. I would also assume that someone like Don Airey who has played with Gary Moore, Bernie Marsden, Ritchie, Tony Iommi, Randy Rhoads, Jake E. Lee, Michael Schenker, John Sykes, Brian May, Uli Jon Roth, Glenn Tipton and last but not least Steve Morse should have a pretty good idea what makes a good guitarist.

    BTW, I liked what Simon said in one of the German interviews about age and how it affects other Purple members: ā€œIā€™m 45 and can no longer do some of the shredding stuff I used to do either. Who cares? I play like I play today.ā€

  15. 15
    Kos says:

    Steve was a borinh guitar player.This record will proove this…

  16. 16
    Ivica says:

    Wrong energy here, welcome Simon to the DP family,we DP fans can be blessed in 20 days, the new DP album will be released
    I remember… in 2003, the “Bananas” tour, four of us big DP fans drove 700 kilometers by car to see DP because maybe it was the last album, the last tour? maybe the last time we see them and listen to our favorite band? because Gillan and company were in serious old RnR years then,….21 years ago!

  17. 17
    Reinder Dijkhuis says:

    The complaints that people have about Simon McBride are so weird to me, because the first time I heard Simon, he was playing Deep Purple material on the CD version of the Contractual Obligation album by Don and Ian, and I was like “Who is this guy?” And it wasn’t about flash or technique or about him pushing the right buttons for me, or even about his stage performance, because I couldn’t see him. Hearing him just felt right. To me, most of the time, even very good non-Purple players still sound like a one-dimensional, flattened interpretation of the original, like they get one aspect of the part right but at the expense of everything else. Simon, on that recording, sounded like the whole package.

    Then came the rumor, which may or may not have been true at the time, but the rumor was definitely there, that Simon was to be Steve’s understudy in case Steve was unable to perform. I could imagine him in that spot and the idea was delightful. As, it turned out, the reality was for me. If I ever go see Deep Purple live again, Simon will be the main attraction for me.

  18. 18
    stoffer says:

    @15 You are entitled to your opinion but Steve was/is not a “borinh” guitar player!! I’m looking forward to the new release very much, I will miss SM but look forward to SMc with the band. Morse had a life changing tragedy and had no choice but to leave otherwise I think he would still be in Purple. I’m looking forward to August to see them and hope Gillan is sounding better!

  19. 19
    Uwe Hornung says:

    I know how most of you guys here don’t give a rat’s ass about the rhythm guitar work of a DP guitarist šŸ˜, but I’ll say it: He’s the best rhythm player Purple have had since Tommy Bolin.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hgbHPB3Gx0E

    And that is something because Bolin was just great on rhythm. And Simon’s rhythm playing attracted me to him even before even his lead style (which took me some getting used to since I don’t generally worship at the altar of Gary Moore though I have tried). DP lost some of their rolling groove when Jon – that Keith Richards of Hammond rhythm playing -, called it a day because Don has a jazzier, more angular approach. Maybe now with Simon in the band some of that “roll” returns, that would be a nice thing.

    Steve was an incredibly precise and creative rhythm player too, but he didn’t really entice you to move your butt. Simon does. And while Ritchie could set highlights with his terse and sparse rhythm style, “rhythm guitar” was really defined by him as “the thing I sometimes have to do between taking breathtaking solos and throwing awesome rock star shapes” šŸ˜† (I’m putting words into his mouth, he never actually said that).

    For all you Ritchie acolytes: In one of the German interviews (there are by now so many in various German music magazines that I get confused, never read as many DP interviews in as short a time span as in the last two weeks or so), Simon stated that without a doubt Ritchie was the most influential player for what DP stands for. And he added how the interplay beteween guitar and Hammond defines the band plus that it worked best between Ritchie and Jon and also Steve and Jon, but perhaps not quite as well between Steve and Don – he tries to get some of that sparkle back now.

  20. 20
    Rock Voorne says:

    Ritchie was 50 doing the STRANGERS IN US ALL album/tour.
    He seemed on fire.

    So Simon is getting prematurely old?

  21. 21
    Terry says:

    Good luck to them all, but even though i am looking forward to the new album , i think the tour is too long and big Ian won’t last it out. I hope i am wrong but I will give Manchester a miss. The long good bye tour was a great night and that memory will stay with me, for the first time my love for the band as lessened.

  22. 22
    MacGregor says:

    Electric six string guitarists are a dime a dozen in this world, just like so many other musicians. So many that never get any recognition in the main stream. Simon McBride happens to be in the right place at the right time. A very good guitarist & good luck to him & he more than anyone is very well aware of his situation, grabbing it with both hands etc. To imply it is anymore than that is pointless. A child prodigy musician, so what, how many more were & are still out there? There could be someone living around the corner who could ‘wipe the floor’ with any other guitarist, where does this end? Let it be. Cheers.

  23. 23
    Daniel says:

    DP were at their best when they weren’t perfect. Simon is indeed great at rhythm, so much so that he overplays the rhythm part to HS, which was very effectice in the first place. Not to mention Anya, where the same precise execution is applied (and not to great effect). These are very minor complaints in the big picture. More concerning is the way he plays his solos note for note from one night to another, leaving very little room for improvisation, which used to tbe band’s biggest trademark. I don’t think it’s because he’s not able to, but for some reason this is the approach he has chosen. If Airey would have been a little more adventurous, maybe this would have rubbed off on Simon too. Hopefully it will change over time.

  24. 24
    Alessandro says:

    I will always love DP, they are my favourite band ever, so I welcome Simon to the band, I drove a long way to see them in Italy last year. However, I second QuelloCheHaRagione, Steve deserved more respect in his family situation. Steve made possible the band to keep being a credible Rock actor with fresh and original music, walking in very difficult shoes for years. Slowing down was more than an option. Age matters, I know, but human feelings do as well. In any case, Long Live Deep Purple. I do not have the impression that Mc Bride is at the same level of his predecessors, but I will be happy to say I’m wrong.

  25. 25
    Gregster says:

    Yo,

    Rock asked…

    qt.”Ritchie was 50 doing the STRANGERS IN US ALL album/tour.
    He seemed on fire….

    So Simon is getting prematurely old ?…

    ***

    No, not at all…As a guitarist now in my 50’s, I suggest that Simon is referring to giving each musical moment its “worth in time”…This means that as much as we all love shredding (*which is often musical venting & searching for the right note / phrase btw ), giving the full value of a targeted-note over a specific chord has much more merit, & carries more musical weight & correctness, plus sits better, than the other possible “x” amount of notes you could have played in there instead.

    There are no rules, simply choices, & as you get older, melody becomes more important sometimes than a shred…(I still like to shred, & in my recordings, often the solo is the end result after 6 or so shreds through the passage, so that “better” phrases are timed & used).

    Peace !

  26. 26
    Uwe Hornung says:

    I can tolerate a little shredding, but I donā€™t miss it if a guitarist eschews it totally: David Gilmour, Mick Ronson, Francis Rossi, Mick Taylor, Billy Gibbons and Mark Knopfler can all entertain me plenty fine. Iā€™m not really the type to admire athletic feats. Was Alvin Leeā€™s intro to Goinā€™ Home shredding? If so, then that was a case of shredding I like(d), but the guitar playing in, say, Dream Theater puts me to sleep. I was at a gig once, it was a real chore to listen to it all. Playing fast gets boring quickly to my ears.

    BTW: I donā€™t think that Ritchie was still at his peak in the 90ies. Already come the reunion in 1984 he was to my ears no longer as naturally fluid as he had been on Made in Japan. He sometimes attempted to play even faster than in the 70ies, but it didnā€™t really work, too many stops and starts, maybe he began overthinking things, Don Airey has often mentioned that Ritchieā€™s overthinking of his solos sometimes stood in his way when compared to Randy Rhoads, Michael Schenker or Gary Moore.

    In any case, being fast was never the reason why I adored Ritchieā€™s playing, even in the majestic Highway Star solo I prefer the melodic runs of the first and middle parts to the twiddly-twiddly neo-classical end (which is still entertaining, tasteful and of course well-executed). The way Ritchie bends notes and his vibrato + his slide playing are all way more important to me than his pick going back and forth at 200 mph. I guess I cannot listen as fast as some people like to play.

    Steveā€™s occasional shredding was always the part of his guitar playing I cared the least for.

  27. 27
    Doug says:

    Terry has hit the nail on the head.

  28. 28
    Uwe Hornung says:

    Martin wrote @12:

    “@ Uwe #9:
    I read the same interview and was quite a bit surprised about the things big Ian had to say. Wasnā€™t he saying for years, if not decades, that Purple is an instrumental band first?

    I get all the PR bla they have to go through with the new album ahead, because ā€œnew is newā€ and so there have to be exciting new things to praise. But to assume Steve wasnā€™t listeningā€¦ donā€™t know. Doesnā€™t sound fair, does it?

    My point is: thereā€™s no need to belittle the past to be excited for futureā€¦”

    Yeah, I remembered Ian’s line about DP being essentially an instrumental band with him adding a little singing too. I believe he meant to say in his new interview that while DP’s instrumental prowess is key (it was always something that set them apart from, say, Uriah Heep, while Box and Hensley were good players, they were instrumentally not nearly in Ritchie’s and Jon’s league – and would be the first to admit it, see below***), he still needs some room and a foundation for his vocals. But Steve comes from a predominantly instrumental music background – it’s a choice he made, neither the Dregs nor the Steve Morse Band succumbed to record company pressure to improve their commercial reach with vocals – and his intricate guitar arrangements often substitute for what a voice would do. So I understand it when Ian says that some of Steve’s material wasn’t as immediate to him as a singer and perhaps had him sometimes wondering “what am I supposed to do here?” As the fate of the Ian Gillan Band amply showed, Ian is not a fan of too complex a music (yet I love it how he sings unorthodox stuff over more elaborate music).

    Doesn’t change the fact that Steve gifted wonderful pieces of music to DP. But he was by nature NOT a sparse player, Steve doesn’t stop painting until he’s done.

    I remember a Jon Lord interview where he said that in hindsight he is thankful for how much room Blackmore left his organ playing in the rhythm department: “He is a very accommodating guitar player.” Blackmore in return once said around the reunion that “most people don’t understand that the Hammond is first and foremost a rhythm instrument, Jon does and he’s excellent at it”. When I read Jon’s “accommodating”-remark about Ritchie I thought that those days were irretrievably gone with Satriani and Morse because they were both guitarists who fill the space you give them whereas Ritchie would often retreat into the musical shadows to then make his spectacular forays from there as musical surprise attacks, pouncing on the band. Ritchie essentially played guitar like a dive bomber or a raptor bird with DP (and I always appreciated that, but none of his successors opted for that style). I believe that Jon shaped Ritchie’s approach to rhythm guitar playing quite a bit, he must have realized already in Mk I days that he doesn’t need to fill space (anymore) because Jon’s mighty Hammond work keeps the band cooking. Remember that before he played with Jon, Ritchie had never played with a Hammond player/keyborader nearly as dominant and self-assured (or as technically excellent). They were a great match. I don’t believe that Jimmy Page and Jon Lord would have worked as well as a team, Jimmy would have likely found Jon’s organ playing too intrusive and dominant for his own guitar-based aural landscapes.

    I’m also not sure whether Steve ever saw the appeal of Ian’s more abstract lyrics, perhaps too English? The lyrics to “Fingers To The Bone” (a number I very much like) came about when Steve ASKED Ian to write something about a farmer facing foreclosure (a topic very much near to Steve, being a farmer himself), it is certainly one of Ian’s more straightforward lyrics, but is it really him?

    ***”Jeb: Would you describe Ken Hensley as a Poor Man’s Jon Lord?

    Ken: Whoa! You’re not afraid to step out on thin ice are you! I don’t
    think I can be compared to Jon Lord, Rick Wakeman, Graham Bond or Keith Emerson.

    The fact of the matter is that I only became a keyboard player
    because I couldn’t get a job as a guitar player. The only reason I ever
    picked up an instrument in the first place was to put music to my poems.
    We had a piano in my house as both my parents were musicians. I
    started picking out melodies and learning chords just to find a way to
    turn poems into songs. The result of that was that I learned to play
    in a way that was totally unorthodox. Even now when I try to play
    something that is formal I can’t do it. On the other side of that is
    that nobody else plays like me – and god forbid they should! I was
    totally self-taught, so technically what I play is wrong but I found a
    way to make it work.

    When I get compared to those guys in polls, I think it is nonsensical.
    Rick Wakeman can play more notes in one song that I have played in my
    entire life. I just found a way to broker that ignorance into something
    successful. I am quite comfortable with who I am.”

  29. 29
    VD says:

    IMO, Ritchie really tapped into some godly energy during the mid-90s. His playing on that Rainbow show in Germany is unmatched — fluid, tasteful, and frighteningly flawless. I don’t care much for the songs he wrote at the time, but his playing, man… Truly magical.

    About time too after 10 years of ~meh~! The 80s were a lost decade for Ritchie’s guitar playing (the 2nd solo in Knocking at your Back Door excepted — every rule has exceptions).

    On topic: I’m frustrated with Ezrin for the restraints he put on Steve. Will he do the same to Simon? His guitra work sounded pretty wild to me on those Gillan concerts of 2016. To be heard if Ezrin managed to tame him too.

  30. 30
    MacGregor says:

    @ 28 – agree with most of your comments Uwe & loved the Ken Hensley comments you placed there. Pretty hard to beat self taught musicians & composers in that aspect. Also the Blackmore & Lord comments, excellent. However (yes their usually is one at least) he he he. The Dregs did go that ‘commercial’ way in a sense with vocalists Alex Ligertwood (Santana) & Patrick Simmons (The Doobie Brothers). Both rather commercial AOR type songs on the Industry Standard album of the 1983 era. Also on Morse’s Stand Up album from 1985. Alex Ligertwood again & also Eric Johnson on vocals on two songs & one of those co written with Peter Frampton.. AOR sounding again. Whether it was record company pressure or Morse simply being fed up with not being ‘accessible’ as such to the more main stream music end of things, who can tell. And of course we are very familiar with his foray with Kansas & the many vocal songs there. So in that aspect, he was well aware of the song based themes. I have also stated the ‘instrumental’ aspect to Morse’s music many times before, that is what he excels at no doubt. To me he seemed to ‘get it’ more with Kansas. That could be as you have said regarding the origins of the musicians involved perhaps. A British influence and a USA one. Sure there are a few Purple songs here & there over the years. Take out Purpendicular & there isn’t much left in the tank to my ears. Although there may be other reasons as to the songs of later DP. It isn’t only Bob Ezrin’s production that can be annoying, it also is his ‘co songwriting’ that seems to be getting in the way. To my ears anyway. Having said that perhaps the old Gillan & Glover recipe has become a tad stale. Time will tell with this new album. If we could just get someone in there at studio time & simply tell Ezrin, ‘no Bob, leave that for someone else’s music”. McBride perhaps could have sorted Ezrin out a little. Hmmmmmmm. Cheers.

  31. 31
    Uwe Hornung says:

    I knew of the vocal tracks on the Dregs album, but that was a half-assed attempt with indeed the record company bending their arm towards the end of the Dregsā€˜ existence (discounting reunions). What point is there putting two or three songs with vocals on an otherwise instrumental album of a chiefly instrumental band and how are you gonna project that live?

    Steve was/is a prolific writer, but the fact of the matter is that he doesnā€˜t really need vocals to express himself. I remember an early Steve Morse Band gig in the 80ies where an audience member (there were no women there and also no one who did not play an instrument) yelled ā€œGet a singer!ā€ and Steve stepped up to the mic and said good-naturedly ā€œNaw, we tried that with the Dregs, didnā€™t really work. No singing here.ā€

    And in Kansas the role of lead vocals – with Steve Walshā€™s and Kerry Livgrenā€™s mutual penchant for hymnic/anthemic vocal lines with little rhythmic movement – was quite a bit different to what Gillan does.

  32. 32
    Martin says:

    @Uwe #28
    Thank you for elaborating, much to be agreed upon!
    I think I mostly got confused about Ian saying “… ich bin mir auch nicht sicher, ob er jemals wirklich auf meinen Gesang geachtet hat.” (Reverse translation: “… I’m not sure either, if he ever really paid attention to my singing.”)
    That’s quite a thing to say, isn’t it?

    Anyways, Steve described himself lately as a composer who happens to play guitar, so that’s totally in line with his approach to writing more on the instrumental side. But to me his rhythm playing (or should we say his accompaniment to the singing parts) always seemed pretty clever and sometimes surprising – and as a guitarist myself – often times inspiring.

  33. 33
    Uwe Hornung says:

    Steve was a great and inventive guitar parts arranger, no argument from me. Not as potentially dangerous and therefore exciting as Ritchie and not as enchantingly carefree as Tommy, but I never heard him play anything mundane or ill-fitting while Big Ian was singing

    Simon has more Belfast street kid raunch in his rhythm playing, it’s gutsy. That seems to enthuse the others too. Steve was a much more controlled player.

  34. 34
    MacGregor says:

    @ 31 – “What point is there putting two or three songs with vocals on an otherwise instrumental album of a chiefly instrumental band and how are you gonna project that live”? A bit surprised you ask that Uwe. PR & the fact that The Dregs were not as we know ‘mainstream’. The chit chat with the presenter in between the two mimed tracks says it all. Bands like the Dregs (progressive & or fusion etc) didn’t get that sort of exposure on the tv at that stage. Anyway, it was obviously a choice that someone seemed to think would be good for them. As I mentioned Morse went a little bit more ‘commercial’ style on the Stand Up album 3 years later & then joining a revamped established band in Kansas, ensured Morse didn’t have to deal with any of the business end of it & he could work permanently with a lead vocalist composing etc.. A similar scenario when he joined DP. Cheers.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KSMx-H8AZTk

  35. 35
    Uwe Hornung says:

    The (Dixie) Dregs were a pure musiciansā€™ musicians band – more so than even Weather Report or Return to Forever. Iā€™ve never met anyone who did not play music himself that was acquainted with their material. And for all their chops, there was relatively little improvisation going on which is why they had more of a guitar clinic than a jazz rock/fusion audience.

    Steve is a very skilled ornamental composer and a great technical guitarist, but his very structured annd controlled approach never allowed him to be a Jeff Beck. Or Jimi Hendrix.

Add a comment:

Preview no longer available -- once you press Post, that's it. All comments are subject to moderation policy.

||||Unauthorized copying, while sometimes necessary, is never as good as the real thing
© 1993-2024 The Highway Star and contributors
Posts, Calendar and Comments RSS feeds for The Highway Star